Post

Avatar
Donald Trump’s guilty verdict on all 34 counts in his hush-money trial on Thursday gave President Biden’s campaign a fresh way to frame the race: a stark choice between someone who is a convicted felon and someone who is not.
Hopeful Yet Cautious, Biden’s Team Aims to Exploit Trump’s Convictionwww.nytimes.com The verdict in Manhattan gave the president and his allies a new way to frame the race: a choice between someone who is a felon and someone who is not.
Avatar
Fresh? The guy has been committing nonstop crimes for decades.
Avatar
Avatar
Yeah,because it was really hard to draw a contrast when Trump was merely a twice-impeached adjudicated rapist and fraudster who cheated on all his wives, boasted about sexually assaulting women, and operated a business that cheated contractors and hired undocumented immigrants.
Avatar
Really, the person who had been indicted zero times versus the person who had been indicted 100 times and only evading justice because of slow horses like Aileen Cannon hadn't suggested itself? This is like Ranger Rick-level writing.
Avatar
"Given vastly different levels of crimeing, can Biden truly be said to be "experienced"?"
Avatar
They don't have to do all the attempted whitewashing at once, there's about six weeks until the sentencing.
Avatar
Notice how the headline leads with tfg, not the actual President. And they're still calling it a hush money trial instead of election interference.
Avatar
Avatar
Your newspaper is trash. This is your shitty take on that criminal ass motherfucker finally experiencing consequences for his actions. To frame it as yet another horse race story. Get fucked.
Avatar
It wasn’t about hush money! It was campaign finance violations! It was fraud! Do you have any actual journalists there?
Avatar
You can’t even get a job at McDonalds with a felony record, yet, this chud is still going to be a presidential nominee. 👍👍👍
Avatar
A war criminal is going to call out a Felon? Can’t wait
Avatar
A fresh way for Biden to frame the race or an accurate description of the facts? Who's to say! Certainly not the Paper of Record, which will continue to both-sides their reporting until Judgement Day ("Some say the Anti-Christ is the literal spawn of Satan. But these Evangelicals say otherwise.")
Personally, I prefer a Candidate who has not been convicted of 34 FELONIES.
Avatar
My day just got way better 😄
Avatar
Why aren’t you framing it that way NYTimes?
Avatar
The fuck is wrong with you
Avatar
I'd rather him stop single-handedly enabling genocide... Among other things.
Avatar
A clear message? I'm sure they'll pass on that.
Avatar
Except weak ass Dems will say “take the high road”. JFC😡
Avatar
It also provides the NYT with the chance to frame it equally factually accurately. But obviously you won’t.
Avatar
Oh, I didn’t realize it was good to bomb people. Wild. I guess my choice is clear (stays home to watch below deck)
Avatar
Avatar
Try to both-sides this, just try lol
Avatar
Avatar
It's not the only thing Biden will exploit. Now he will be the only contestant. They don't even needbto show up or rig anything. Just sit and win. "democracy" It's only going to get worse from here on.
Avatar
Це впершу чергу плюс для республіканців очистити свої ряди від осуджених та брехливих лузерів
Avatar
Here’s why that’s bad news for Joe Biden
Avatar
It was an election interference trial. Stop trivializing it. He lied and cheated to win in ‘16; he lied and cheated to try to win in ‘20; he is currently lying and cheating to try to win now.
Avatar
He was already a convicted rapist.