At first I thought this was referring to Polaris' tenure as the North Star, since the Earth's axial precession means what is the "north star" changes over time, but NOPE, the star itself is estimated to be 70 million years old, and sharks have been around for 450 million years. Mind blown.
Reminder to new users here:
Cladistically, there is no such thing as a fish or a tree. Also, sharks have existed longer than Polaris, the North Star has.
@scalzi.com So you know how John Denver's "Take Me Home, Country Roads" has a line that in the Blue Ridge Mountains, which are part of the Appalachians, "life is old there, older than the trees"?
Those mountains are older than all the trees.
www.science.org/content/arti...
Alas, the Appalachian Mountains we have now are just the worn down nubbins of their former glory. Must have been amazing.
If you want to see a new mountain, Tahoma (aka Mt. Rainier), near Seattle, is so young you can measure its age in 1000s of years, 500,000 years. Much younger than sharks.
And if I'm correctly remembering/understanding a recent SciShow vid on the subject, the variable, Polaris Aa, is thought to be much younger than Polaris B, and that it's weird? Based on my vague understanding of system formation, I'd expect stars in a *-nary system to be very close in age.