Banacek 🇵🇱

They don't need a debate. There is no debate between the two parties, policy wise.They just need evidence of the current President being in charge. If he's not, everything comes undone.

Reply to

Sarah Weinman

Can we get that series made, with Christian Slater?

Reply to

Jeremy Chao

To be fair, he could now order a drone strike against debt collectors as an official act

Reply to

Ana Marie Cox

We'll never know how Bernie would've fared vs Trump.

Reply to

Jonathan Ladd

Not an expert, just a professional cynic, something that used to be more commonplace in traditional media before corporate consolidation.

White executives

plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

All we need is a Delorean, a lightning strike, and a 2008 briefing book.

The Art Of Politics

You've gotta accentuate the positive!

Reply to

southpaw

Whatever Ron Klain says, do the opposite

Reply to

Andrew Bloomberg

This is why the governors are towing the party line. Not because they believe in Joe. Because they believe they're better set up to win in '28.

Harris-Fetterman is better, but either one would win.

The progressive prosecutor.

Reply to

Michael Love

That would be worth it for the memes alone.

Reply to

Tim Onion

Kayfabe vibes

It's academic. Joe doesn't want to stand down. Trump will return.

Reply to

Seth Cotlar

I don't think anyone asked for this particular major motion picture.

Reply to

bob barker 🍉

Gaza is a sore spot mostly on the coasts. Fetterman would bring enough Carhartt votes to keep Michigan in the D column.

A Harris-Fetterman ticket would pull the proverbial rabbit out of a hat.

Reply to

Cooper Lund

You only get to be an outsider once. Even Trump knows this.

As nature intended

Talcum X on moral relativism.

Reply to

Popehat

That article was so exhausting I'll never venture out socially ever again.