Look, I'm not one to say much about publications taking some sort of controversy and turning it into merch (we've done it a bunch), but generally speaking, if the message of your merch is "we support fascist insurrection," you might just be the fucking problem.
In the early 70s, Mad did a guide to political types, from extreme left to extreme right, listing defining traits (every single one had "Distrust Nixon"). One of the far-right traits was "Wears Spiro Agnew wristwatches for the wrong reason."
Same energy.
No, so many have learned nothing. I can't believe how fast basic rights are disappearing right now. We had these fights and we won and 60 years later we're back at square one.😖
There was a CD-ROM a while back, I think. That's about it. A lot of those "everything on CD" projects died due to a mixture of complex rights and "Hey, if we SELL something, we lose all the money we could make RENTING a smaller part of it!"
For Windows 95 and 98!
Yup I remember when it came out. My parents would not let me buy it back then (I was in high school). If I remember right it was super expensive (it wasn’t the content, the price)
It’s crazy because we know they have the scans somewhere on a hard dive. They just need to release it.
It's funny how they mock the "American Student" as someone who'll grow out of it, when he's got actual tanks and soldiers in gas masks with guns. Same as it ever was...
Oy, the "Black Militant" and the "Looter." Yikes, I say, Yikes.
It reminds me of the time I read Tom Wolfe's "Bonfire of the Vanities" and thought, well he's really good at presenting stereotypes as if they actually exist, as real people.
There’s a difference between being critical and being supportive of power and if your publication’s purpose is the latter we just call that propaganda.
I would assume it somehow runs afoul of some legal rules that come with their hilarious “non-profit” status?
Conservatives: the market sorts the winners from the losers.
National Review: As a smol bean non-profit conservative intellectual flagship, our fundraising widget is not for fundraising
Much like anything that comes out of NRO. I just wanted to point out the absurdity of the NRO claiming a $200 flag is not "a commercial venture." Are their readers actually as dumb as they treat them?
What's funny is, on first look I figured the "Appeal to Law" shirt was a criticism of his malfeasance. Not until I saw who was selling it did I realize it was supposed to be a statement in support.
I'm mad I didn't think of this. The sheer gull to charge 197 for them! Grifting god's perfect morons, a brain so smooth you could use it as a reference surface.
