In Opinion
The greatest public service President Biden can now perform is to announce that he will not run for re-election, the editorial board writes after Thursday's presidential debate.
What about the convicted felon, folks? The noted fraud? The rapist? The classified document thief? Should he be standing down? No? Illuminating. Not at all good, but illuminating.
Shouldn't the guy who bragged about sneaking into teenage girls rooms while they were undressing step down? Or does it not matter to the GOP that he raped a little girl with his pal Jeffrey Epstein?
He absolutely should, but someone replacing Biden might actually help the Dems, whereas the right is so deeply lost to evil that anyone but Trump somehow stands less of a chance
If you are talking about Biden, let's hope so. We don't want a doddery man, with memory problems, living in Putin's pocket, who is a convicted felon, pathological liar, sexual predator, greedy, corrupt and incompetent business man who steals classified documents to win.
perhaps I missed the recent New York Times editorial calling for Donald Trump to step aside for the good of the country in the wake of his 34 felony convictions.
could you share a link here please?
Same link:
"Trump’s own performance ought to be regarded as disqualifying. He lied brazenly and repeatedly about his own actions, his record as president and his opponent. He described plans that would harm the American economy, undermine civil liberties and fray...relationships with other nations"
Do….do you think a different Republican nominee would not want to gut all federal regulation? Is your position that the Times should be demanding a better advocate for mass detention and executions?
Is Democracy on the line? Is this the most important election in history? What do you want man?
This is the same gaslighting Dems have received from media for years : behave better, be different, be more moderate and appealing to Rs and independents instead of your own base. No republican is ever told to be more liberal.
This is an astounding misunderstanding of Trump. He is an opportunistic celebrity. He believes in nothing. There are absolutely ‘true believers’ cultivated now in HIS party that would take the steps he was unwilling to take.
I understand what the column posits. It’s ludicrous. He isn’t POTUS and also a private candidate to become POTUS. He’s the fucking President. In your brain, is the concern a bad debate performance and not cognition generally? It’s definitely the latter for me.
Who is replacing Trump when he relents to the demands of the Times Editorial Board? Will Joe be a better candidate against that person or do you think he will just run unopposed?
I don’t know man. I didn’t create this counterfactual! Who’s above Trump that can even replace him? No idea!
I would bet my life on the fact that if Obama called on Joe to resign and make way, it would happen. Within days.
It's not rocket science.
Travel more often & learn that such characters have no business being/running for POTUS—even if they fooled a pool of ignoramuses, having committed Election Interference & Fraud while leveraging Cambridge Analytica & Russian election interference ops to get into WH before.▼
A convicted felon, fraudster, rapist, NATO & national security threat is running for POTUS in pre-WW 2024 with ZERO fact-checking during a Presidential Debate. Who, at the New York Times, is going to ask the orange crook to get lost???▼