Look, I was skeptical back when it just plagiarized words, sucked up water and energy and eliminated people’s jobs, but they really sold me on it by making it more expensive.
“Remember that generative AI is not once and done…You’re going to continue to push compute, and build models that are larger, and so you will have to continue to upgrade devices in order to keep up with the pace of generative AI.” 😩 www.wsj.com/tech/ai/the-...
Of course there won't be any other small screen options. But then with the death of the Golden Age of TV, I've already been reading more than any time since I joined the workforce over a decade ago.
revolutionizing the field of economics by inventing a product that requires infinite supply and generates absolutely zero demand, causing a stack overflow error that crashes the game
There are a LOT of variables to each model, but in many cases the real accuracy rate is well below 75%.
I don't know about anyone else, but I've never had a job where more money was thrown at me for being correct 3/4 of the time. And I'm old AF.
Listen Listen they aren't selling what it is NOW. They selling what it will be in the FUTURE! its going to get better, it's the future, it's not new wave, you gotta adapt or get left behind, here stick it in your phone, stick it in your fridge, don't act like you don't want it of course you do
Can't wait until the guys using this to shortchange creatives by doing the work w/ AI then hiring artists at a lower rate to fix the AI's work are paying what it would cost to just have the creative work on the complete project.
I love this dominant business model of "spend a quadrillion dollars on it then work out if there's any revenue to be made". It sure paid off for the metaverse.