Overturning Chevron is going to usher in an era where self-taught judicial expertise in technical areas such as chemistry, statistics, mechanical engineering, biology, geomorphology, epidemiology, mathematics, and many other fields will once more be able to shine forth as it did in the Middle Ages.
With the greatest possible respect I am sorry to say that at this time I have less than no interest in Medievalists loyally popping up to tell me a lot of things in the Middle Ages were great actually
But I thought you valued expertise, no? And despaired at uninformed people making judgements about things they don’t understand?
Perhaps I misunderstood.
Perhaps you did.
Look mate, I have no interest in sniping with you, a Surprised Eel Historian. I now regret assuming a typical reader would see my original remark not, in the main, as really about the Middle Ages, but more as what you might call an exasperated rhetorical fling at recent events.
Government by the people kicked out of the SCA. Great.
On the other hand, the idea of fighting Pennsic for control of the Supreme Court has some appeal.
But surely it will be worse than this? Being self taught speaks to some curiosity.
What the court has done is not encourage jurists to become self taught generalists. It has encouraged narrow minded incurious zealots to impose their will. "The law is everything", not "everything is the law".
Seriously Team Blue needs to talk about how Trump's SCOTUS wants more doors falling off of airplanes so billionaires can make more money.
Deathtrap planes, poisoned food, dead workers, all because the Thomas and Alito want more gifts from billionaires.
Repeat it over and over
Soon it will be judicial precedent that you *can* in fact construct a square with the same area as a circle, as god intended
Indiana was just ahead of it’s time en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana...
I had never heard of that. Damn. A basic understanding of geometry and calculus should be required for any legislative, congressional, gubernatorial or presidential position.
Important to clarify in advance the size of the gratuity which is potentially on offer.
There should be a pre-courption (pre-crup) agreement setting it all out so if the gratuity isn't forthcoming the matter can be resolved through litigation.
I think a difference may be that, back then, polymaths made a good-faith effort to study those fields and had a reasonable chance of learning most of what was known at the time.
Federalist society judges will just read briefs from industry and more often than not follow that guidance.
