Coach Finstock: Bawlmer reporters throwing two big fingers at the new bosses. TURN THIS UP.

Bawlmer reporters throwing two big fingers at the new bosses. TURN THIS UP.

The "screw it let's be legends" attitude is beautiful.

This too! Loving the Baltimore media’s response to that rich asshole. bsky.app/profile/josh...

The Baltimore Banner got tapes of new Sun owner David Smith's comments at the staff meeting the other day, and HOO BOY e.g., “Let me tell you something I can’t do anything about. I can’t do anything about a person who is a product of the Baltimore City school system."

New Baltimore Sun owner on tape bashing city schools, local politicians and morewww.thebaltimorebanner.com With his immense media holdings, Smith is one of the most influential figures in American journalism. Yet he rarely gives interviews, in part because of the contempt he feels toward mainstream media

Fuck that guy

This is The Wire level shit here. Love it.

giphy.com/gifs/QmETVm2...

The Wire GIF - Find & Share on GIPHYgiphy.com Discover & share this The Wire GIF with everyone you know. GIPHY is how you search, share, discover, and create GIFs.

GET HIS ASS

The way that this headline reads, the Baltimore Sun told a roomful of reporters something a few days ago. I really wish people would stop dangling their participles all over the place.

Until proven otherwise, we’ll have to assume that the SBG chair reduced the size of a council in order to finance a ballot question, which has a number of signatures.

Alternatively, the ballot question might have been financed by the sheer size of the Sinclair Broadcasting group’s chair slashing council.

I think that is what it says, though. In the usage where people refer to the policy and management decisions made and related through official channels as the actions and statements of the organization.

But the Baltimore Sun didn't stand in a huge room of people and speak.

Well, no. The Baltimore Sun is a newspaper, it has no voice with which to speak. The White House is a budling, it does not make statements. Moscow is a city, China is a country, it's not strictly true to suggest that either are capable of having an agenda or goal except in statistical trends.

Right; the latter three examples are best described as a synecdoche, where a part -- i.e, the Kremlin -- represents a whole. It doesn't apply in this case, is what I keep trying to tell you. The entity that spoke is an actual human person.