yeah yeah I know what the board wrote in the piece about the convicted felon, but did they also publish an entire piece calling for the convicted felon to step down? Wait, what?
Calling for Biden to drop out, but not Trump, sure sounds like the kind of thing a fundamentally Trumpist newspaper would do. As usual, the Times is confusing only if you buy their branding as centrist or left-leaning.
“A blatant tief of national secrets” is called a traitor; & as Commander in Chief, he should be court-martialled! The Rosenbergs were hanged for an alleged incident of giving nuclear secrets to Russia, & it wasn’t even proven!
He deserves no less!
To be fair, this is the same shitgibbon rag that platforms/platformed David Brooks, Bari Weiss, Brett Stephens, Maureen Dowd, Peggy Noonan, and a whole host of other mediocre, self absorbed douchy white HOA board members of white upper middle class neoliberal & neoconservative mediocracy
“mediocre, self absorbed douchy white HOA board members of white upper middle class neoliberal & neoconservative mediocracy”
🏆
Particularly HOA board members.
What bullshit. It’s a statement of principle, not a mandate. If Biden deserves a call out to step down, Trump deserves one times fifty. Their position is beyond absurd.
I get the frustration with the middle of the road liberal rags. And the NYT's unerring ability to deliver fascism because that is what liberalism does.
But what would be the point of them calling on Trump to stand down? They're (allegedly) a pro-Dem rag and that is their constituency.
