Larry Glickman: Would love to know the evidence to back up this claim from The NY Times story about how Trump’s strongest supporters are viewing the guilty verdict.

Would love to know the evidence to back up this claim from The NY Times story about how Trump’s strongest supporters are viewing the guilty verdict.

Maybe they asked random woman-on-the-street Natalie Brumfeld again www.nytimes.com/2024/02/22/u... bsky.app/profile/saba...

Look, we at the NYT just found this random Alabaman lady who approves of the court's ruling, and also here she is pictured in the header of this article about Roe v. Wade (weird coincidence!) www.vox.com/2020/3/5/211...

What a ridiculous fucking sentence

Vibes are perfectly valid data points

All their political reporting sounds like the bottom third of papers at a creative writing seminar, you'd have to read it like you read a dimestore romance novel.

It’s all vibes

It's them, They're trump's strongest supporters.

wait I thought the New York Times could not do mind reading, that's why for the longest time they could never say that Trump lied

Which values? Rich people grifting with impunity?

Broad swaths.

Evidence? We ain't got no evidence! We don't need no evidence! I don't have to show you any stinking evidence!

Sure. Covering up smarmy convention/trade show sex are our values.

It's out there - here are a few examples I've spotted...

same. also really, really hope it is true, because fuck them

Post