anything that brings about the death of the democrat party (the most racist party in amerikan history) and leads to its replacement by a socialist party is good.
Some Millennials in my timeline are insecure because Gen Zs are telling them their ankle socks age them.
I can't stress enough that you don't need to care about what a bunch of 20-somethings think about your clothes, mainly bc you don't have to care about what ANYONE thinks about your clothes.
I thought Nina Power was that lady who drew comics back in like the mid- to late-2000s and was kind associated with the pink tide. Who tf am I thinking of?
the problem with the democratic party is that it was founded by racists, who handed the party over to a long line of racists, who are responsible for such things as indian removal, the preservation and expansion of slavery, segregation, internment camps, mass incarceration, and much more.
i'm holding my nose and voting for the PSL again. i think they're stalinist bureaucrats but they're an obvious lesser evil to the democrat on the ballot.
If one is EVER in the incredibly privileged position to choose between the lesser of two evils one has a moral and ethical duty to do so. Don’t be a fucking child.
libs love going "OMG look at this wacko" when SC justices are just, like, right. john roberts saying political science is bullshit? he's 100% correct! samuel alito channeling Chairman Mao and asserting there are irresolvable, antagonistic, contradictions in politics? he's fucking right!
SCOTUS: Chevron schmevron. We’re the regulators now.
Political science: Okay fine, here’s some data on redistricting for you to consider.
SCOTUS: Fuck off, nerd www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-...
yeah, mitch mcconnell's just gonna let biden pack the courts single digit months away from an election that biden is going to lose. libs, sorry, your chance to avoid this shit was in 2020 when you could have elected bernie sanders instead.
A president supporting court packing for the explicit purpose of reigning in presidential power, including his own, after a Supreme Court made a wildly un-American, precedent-breaking decision to expand it, would be making the best case for a president to support court-packing.
John Adams: A government of laws, and not of men
Theodore Roosevelt: No man is above the law
John Roberts: Presidents don't have to follow laws in office, at least not all of them, and if a sitting president breaks the law, he's immune from any legal consequences for life and you just have to deal
Originalists just violated the principles & concerns of the Constitution's framers.
The framers broke away from a king deemed a tyrant.
They profoundly distrusted centralized power.
They even considered an executive panel -- rather than a single president -- to not give that much power to 1 man.