If you ever feel like you have too much contempt for the DC opinion class please remember that it can never match their contempt for you
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...
The Swerve, which is brainlessly execrable, also won a pulitzer around that time. Might be time to put the Pulitzers down. We can use the stuff my vet used on our cat.
The worst part is that maybe a quarter of Parker's columns are incisive & quotable, meaning I often click when her name pops up. And we're supposed to be tolerant toward NeverTrump conservatives, right? But damn, her bad ones are bad.
I wrote to WaPo for public apology for not running the flag story. No response. Now I’ve read this opinion piece and I’ve cancelled my WaPo subscription.
Is it professional courtesy that people seem reluctant to place names immediately w/offending articles in these call-out posts? If a pattern of behavior, surely anti-democracy writers shouldn't be rewarded w/untarnished reputations or being granted the obscuring blur of mere credit to the outlet.
She’s the ‘life of the party’ that guys love to date because she’s exciting. They only regret meeting her when she’s burning their clothes on the front yard.
I don’t know if I would consider that threatening violence but it was definitely intimidation. But, hey, if you’re the life of the party, you can send as many black SUVs where ever you want. Gawd, I hate rich people.
First rule of Chardonnay Moms Walking Club is don’t talk [in anything remotely approaching a critical way] about [other members of] Chardonnay Moms Walking Club.
i'm convinced articles like this are a psy-op trying to trick people into getting themselves banned. no real human could so enthusiastically court the guillotine, right??
