The Washington Post: Justice Amy Coney Barrett had a breakout term on the Supreme Court. With piercing questions from the bench, and a willingness to break ranks with other Republican nominees in an era of conservative dominance on the court.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett had a breakout term on the Supreme Court. With piercing questions from the bench, and a willingness to break ranks with other Republican nominees in an era of conservative dominance on the court.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett is charting her own path on the benchwapo.st With piercing questions and a willingness to break ranks with fellow conservatives, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett played a new role this term.

Jesus Christ you guys she voted to make the president a Tsar.

gosh as a WAPO reader I'd hardly know she is a far right religious extremist with a violent disdain for legal precedent who just helped declare a convicted NYC real estate con man king keep up the great work, social media team!

She ruled that presidents are kings. What the fuck is this shit?

This one really took the world record in "badly aged takes" with minus three days.

Are you fucking kidding me?

No one believes you.

lol

Yes, what a paragon of virtue who has gone rogue on such topics as ending abortion rights, eliminating Chevron deference, and declaring the president a king! …wait, sorry, I’m being told she voted for all of those things and is exactly as extreme as the rest of them.

Hey, how did she vote on Dobbs and the immunity case?

Not when it really mattered.

How did she vote on Dobbs? Did she help overturn Chevron? What about the presidential immunity case? Oh, she voted with republicans on all of those? Well then fuck off with this bullshit.

WTF?

You are truly irredeemable

also she thinks republican presidents should be kings

She voted for a king.

This bullshit is why I cancelled my WaPo subscription.

is this a joke

Which cases did she "break ranks" in that mattered?

Leave the parody to @theonion.com

She took away the rights of tens of millions of people. Some have died. Get fucked. I’m so glad I cancelled my subscription to your shitty fascist propaganda.

“Era of conservative dominance” There hasn’t been a majority progressive court since the late 60’s. How long is a fuckin era?

248 years and counting

Seriously, go fuck yourself with this garbage.

Any judge who voted in favour of sweeping immunity deserves absolutely no praise whatsoever.

We've got a brand new superstar for the end of the Constitutional Republic who voted with the reactionary majority on every single case of interest to multibillionaire donors!

Fuck you

There hasn’t been a legitimate Republican choice for SCOTUS since (at least!) they stole the presidency for George W. Now this stolen seat voted to make the president a king. Shame on everyone involved with this propaganda.

This comes across as covering your ass for the eventual purge of the intellectuals by the looming fascist state

Are you stoned or just stupid?

I’m stoned right now, and can see this is bullshit.

Fair.

Yeah that's why almost every vote on important cases was 6-3

You guys are clueless. Democracy dies in shitty legal analysis.

The Roberts Court undid the US Constitution in one ruling more than any ruling ever has undermined the Constitution. Amy Conry Barrett supported that ruling for reasons that seem to be naked partisanship.

Where does Trump v. United States go on this list? 1. Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) 2. The Civil Rights Cases of 1883 3. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) 4. Lochner v. New York (1905) 5. Buck v. Bell (1927) 6. Korematsu v. United States (1944) www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/s...

13 Worst Supreme Court Decisions of All Timewww.findlaw.com Not all Supreme Court opinions are great. For every Brown v. Board of Ed., there's a Buck v. Bell. FindLaw takes you through 9 of the Supreme Court's worst decisions, from denying Black citizenship to...

7. Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) 8. Bush v. Gore (2000) 9. Citizens United v. FEC (2010)

She’s a disgrace like the rest and also complicit in killing this country so spare me trying to make her look good

Everyone involved in writing, editing, and posting this is a fascist-loving disgrace.

ITS RATIO TIME

hey this is bad and you should feel bad

Good hustle WaPo, but not going to match “give the guy who doesn’t believe in democracy a Don’t Vote column on Independence Day” by the grey lady

Dat ratio, tho.

the two most important newspapers in the country are cheerleading the gravest constitutional crisis since the civil war

The kind of pieces you publish when you oust your longtime editor in favor of a WSJ stooge.

[ clears throat, walks up to mic ] FUUUUUUUCK OFF WITH THIS AGGRANDIZING BULLSHIT. YOU'RE A FUCKING NEWSPAPER OUTLET, NOT A PUBLIC RELATIONS FIRM YOU WANKERS.

The “liberal” media, folks!

To the person running the social media account, is it worth it?