Doesn’t he have multiple companies he is ostensibly in charge of that are all facing down increased competition, regulatory scrutiny, and shareholder unhappiness that he should be working on instead of whatever this is?
Do you not remember the discourse about a guy ‘Not being able to name a single woman author’ in response to a very specific question about one particular author? Nobody understands Jeopardy, apparently.
There’s a long-running gag on the Simpsons where things that should not burst into flames (shopping carts) explode on impact. This was not intended as an instruction manual for vehicle production.
I always wondered if that was a reference to easily exploding cars in action movies or actually exploding Ford Pintos. I would never have guessed it was another Simpson’s prophecy.
[staring down the prospect of a UAW-backed Dark Brandon II: The Rebrandoning scenario when you have open conflicts with 7 regulators] woke jeopardy ideas
No pol wants their name attached to a bunch of people losing a lot of money when his company's stocks take a huge hit when the corporate welfare shuts off.
I mean, SpaceX has managed to not screw up anything that they're actually contracted to do (which is more than can be said for Boeing), but by all accounts, there's substantial infrastructure in that company to keep Musk away from any part of SpaceX that does anything for real.
