Post

Avatar
More than 500,000 books have been removed from our lending library due to the publishers’ lawsuit, including more than 1,300 banned and challenged titles. 📚🕳️ Sign our open letter to the publishers urging them to restore access to these books. 📖✍️ #LetReadersRead 👉 blog.archive.org/2024/06/17/l...
Avatar
How about paying authors a fair price for the books you lend
Avatar
We support authors by buying books, especially ebooks that we can own, preserve, and lend to one reader at a time. We want a better deal for authors because the license-only, streaming model doesn't work for creators or libraries: popula.com/2022/08/11/o...
Own Music! Own Books!popula.com Owning media is now an act of countercultural defiance
Avatar
This elder millennial is on a one person butlerian jihad in pursuit of reclaiming physical media.
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
You also lend books under copyright that you haven't paid the copyright owners a dime for.
Avatar
If I walk into a used bookshop and buy a book, I can loan it to whoever I want with no repercussions. Same if someone gives me one as a gift, or if I pick one up when my local lidbary gets shut down and gives away their stock. No money to the copyright owner is required to change hands, all legal.
Avatar
Fair use by an individual is not the same thing as opening lending to any number of people at once.
Avatar
Please leave the internet archive alone, they are desperately trying to save our cultural knowledge from the digital maw. They are librarians. Go after profit obsessed publishers and big tech instead
Avatar
Avatar
These a bigger issues than just the Internet Archive. Library systems all over the world now rely on mostly one product for digital lending, Overdrive. Recently Overdrive was sold to a so-called vulture fund. This puts all of our cultural history at great risk. 1/
Avatar
For hundreds of years publishers, libraries and readers existed in a delicate and nourishing ecosystem. This is now all under threat by rapacious, extractive content farms who will hoover up all this content, and then just delete entire archives on a whim, leaving AI chum in its place. 2/
Avatar
In a nightmarish digital world of AI hallucinations and meglamanicterabytes worth of useless AI chum - the only place to find the original, unaltered material will end up being the Internet Archive. 3/
Avatar
Avatar
How about both things can be true at the same time. The internet archive does extremely important work but is wrong on this specific subject
Avatar
Avatar
That’s not a very persuasive argument
Avatar
We're on blue sky this isn't a scholarly debate lmao.
Avatar
Here is the grown up version. These a bigger issues than just the Internet Archive. Library systems all over the world now rely on mostly one product for digital lending, Overdrive. Recently Overdrive was sold to a so-called vulture fund. This puts all of our cultural history at great risk. 1/
Avatar
For hundreds of years publishers, libraries and readers existed in a delicate and nourishing ecosystem. This is now all under threat by rapacious, extractive content farms who will hoover up all this content, and then just delete entire archives on a whim, leaving AI chum in its place. 2/
Avatar
In a nightmarish digital world of AI hallucinations and meglamanicterabytes worth of useless AI chum - the only place to find the original, unaltered material will end up being the Internet Archive. 3/
Avatar
You should be aware that most critiques of the Internet Archive have actually been driven by big publishers astroturfing as local writers groups. Under the old pre-digital system publishers, libraries and authors existed in a healthy ecosystem. It is not IA that is squeezing every last bit of profit
Avatar
Avatar
the fucking RECEIPTS lmaoooo
Avatar
Sports international broadcast and streaming rights are a very different subject than writers not being paid fairly.
Avatar
listen im not the pot calling the kettle black here
Avatar
If I’d been posting about pirating books you might have a case, but I didn’t.
Avatar
Obviously so. If you’re interested in a discussion about sports international al broadcast rights let me know
Avatar
I believe they already do that, and I think we can be fairly certain the publishers didn't have the books removed because the authors weren't getting paid fairly. ;P
Avatar
I can’t speak for the publishers, but the IA wasn’t paying writers the usual library book fees.
Avatar
Is this perhaps because they're using donated books instead of buying new copies?
Avatar
Perhaps. Scanning them and lending those copies is where it gets legally murky
Avatar
Where does the law stand on you streaming football matches? Legal or illegal?
Avatar
What is it that you think "the usual library book fees" are?
Avatar
I believe I already answered this in a different thread
Avatar
They purchase a copy of every book they lend out.
Avatar
Didn't they get sued precisely because they were lending out books that they didn't have copies of?
Avatar
They do not purchase library copies, which they would then be allowed to lend. That is the issue here
Avatar
Hi there, former public librarian and current healthcare librarian here. What are you imagining "library copies" to be?
Avatar
In this case, ebooks purchased to be loaned
Avatar
So your complaint is that they aren't purchasing ebooks, not that you think there are special "library copies" of print books. Okay. So in cases where an ebook isn't available, what are you proposing they do?
Avatar
how about you delete your account
Avatar
Really? I say something you disagree and I should delete my account? I hope you change this attitude in the future
Avatar
How come your account isn't deleted