I mean, they are right *now* but with this Court anything's possible.
That said, I wonder how much in cash and prizes it would actually take to turn a legendary Long Dong Silver enthusiast against pornography?
really stunned that, in all the reporting about Project 2025's goal of banning pornography, very few journalists are noting that pornography and sexual speech are protected by the First Amendment.
Would not be surprised. Lots of government agencies require you to do remote logins on a work laptop using a VPN. Not sure if he does any of that from home, but if so, yeah.
Say what??
I mean, I WFH, and I'm sure there's boatloads of VPNs on the backside of that, but from my perspective I just sign into Windows, then a log in prompt before it allows me into the network.
I'm googling. This is from the 1770s, Carl August Ehrensvärd's "Caricature of Gustav III's Attempt to Produce an Heir," in which Finnish nobleman Adolf Fredrick Munck is depicted assisting King Gustav III with his first sexual intercourse with the Queen. True story.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_F...
You can adjust your moderation settings, Mr. Bonin. I had to click on it for it to show (and, yes, mild regret 😄).
Here's how mine are, for an example:
In 1859 Verdi wrote an opera called "Un Ballo in Maschera" in which Gustav III is assassinated. The censors were livid and Verdi had to re-settle the opera in Boston, MA and Gustav III became the governor of Boston. His homosexuality was alluded to with his perky boy page Oscar, sung by a soprano.
Uh, that's another thing: do conservatives no longer care about business and protecting industries? Because wouldn't any serious attempt to ban pornography run into a lot of very wealthy angry people?
Yeah, considering the respect that this court has had for precedents this term, why should we assume that anything has to hold up? Especially if Project 2025 proponents view any expression of sexuality as inherently pornographic and therefore should be banned, which to me seems to be the goal.
Though predicting SCOTUS these days is a mug's game, I'm a mug, so I'd say it's unlikely they'll permit the government to ban actual porn any time soon
They might, though, permit bans on what Heritage MEANS by "porn," i.e., anything relating to trans people that might end up being read by children
I still feel anyone trying to end functional access to porn would hit a wall even harder than someone openly bragging about killing a rambunctious puppy.
Considering I’ve gotten souvenir dildo ads on Twitter, I get the feeling this might get rather complicated for ol’ Elon. Banning porn & ads sounds bad for business!
Haven't we already been down this road with constitutional challenges by Hustler and Playboy? And the same with "...Congress will make no establishment of religion...?" What is it these depraved are so thick about? The real ... 1
