Eleven Commandments.
Louisiana's law mandates a specific text. Not from Exodus, or Deuteronomy, but from the Fraternal Order of Eagles. They used a KJV-sounding pastiche adapted from the Bible and paraphrased by a Minnesota juvenile court judge in the 1950s.
It's not the Bible. It's the Eagles.
So, even within Christianity, the Ten Commandments aren't precisely the same across traditions — the text is translated and even *numbered* differently.
This law appears to mandate the KJV version — a Bible translation entire Christian traditions reject. apnews.com/article/loui...
Because Lutherans, Catholics, and Jews all number the biblical commandments differently, the Eagles' version sought a broader civil religious appeal by not numbering them. It's just a list of 11, or maybe 12, unnumbered, nearly-but-not-exactly biblical statements.
Oh, and it was a movie promotion.
The Fraternal Order of Eagles didn't get much traction until Cecil B. DeMille decided to use their campaign to promote his movie. He funded & designed the monuments the Eagles pushed for public lands across the US. (Yul Brynner, Pharaoh himself, was sent to cut the ribbon for the first one.)
That is the source of the language now mandated by law in Louisiana.
Meaning, also, that posting the biblical texts from Exodus or Deuteronomy, in translation or in Hebrew, would violate the law. It FORBIDS the biblical text. Only the DeMille-approved Fraternal Order of Eagles text is permitted.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but no one knows the the Ten Commandments since they were told to Moses by God, written on those stone tablets that Moses immediately destroyed in a fit of rage after seeing his people worshipping a golden calf. What we think of the "Ten Commandments" were never divine.
God then told Moses to “Hew thee two tablets of stone like unto the first: and I will write upon these tablets the words that were in the first tablets, which thou brakest.” So the same words were rewritten on new tablets, which were saved.
LA isn't the first. SCOTUS ruled against this when KY mandated it decades ago. But to be honest I wouldn't be mad if the legal community just stays out of it and lets the various flavors of evangelicals destroy each other over which version(s) get displayed.
Is it bad that my first thought upon hearing this news was to wonder what friend of a local pol owns the company that has the exclusive state contract to print and frame all these copies? 0_o
Nah, that is exactly how this shit works down here. There's been a deadlock on food vending for 20 years because the exclusive contract belonged to a family who got too busy being politicians with their hot dog money to run a food cart monopoly.
> Not from Exodus, or Deuteronomy
Maybe that's so the GOP SCOTUS justices can ultimately say with a straight face that "The text is not a quote directly from the Bible therefore..." in their homily-laden, 6-3 winning ruling.
We go from "this isn't truly a machine gun" to "this isn't truly the Bible."
Yeah, my thought as I read this really interesting history was "DON'T GIVE EM ANY IDEAS."
I can imagine the GOP justices saying in private: libraries & public transportation aren't in the bible. In public they say also not in the constitution. So any federal funding of ANYTHING is in question. If they want to they go originalism - trains were created ~40 years after the constitution.
You can check out any time you like, but thought shalt never leave (unless you are an asylum seeker, in which case thou shalt leave immediately without due process).
This is the most American thing. Some private organization butchers some text (even gets the number wrong), it gets used to promote a movie, and then is used in the most rules lawyer-like way possible to argue a technicality.
When Jesus of Nazareth was asked which of the ones in Exodus was the most important, he was like “yeah, absolutely: the second major idea out of the Shema in Deuteronomy, and also this explanation for the rationale behind one of the rules in Leviticus; that all, together, is the singular thing.”
Aren’t all the prophets pretty much:
“Medammit, you wanted a king and I gave you a king. Now look at the mess you and your kings have made for yourselves!”?