UghObWi

Profile banner

UghObWi

@ughobwi.bsky.social

I can’t believe it’s come to this here in the good ole U.S. of A. Actually I can…
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
Constitution: People involved in insurrections should not be President. Roberts court:...hmm, no, I don't see it. Constitution:.... Roberts court: but the president should have immunity for crimes
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
Avatar
Thread
Never, never give in to apathy when the stakes are high. As always: think of Ella Baker.
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
I haven't stopped thinking about this since I read it.
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
I cannot control my wretched flagwife. Anyway here’s my ruling on abortion: no one can have one.
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
Alito lied about the reason the flag was up because he didn’t know the couple had text messages establishing the date of when the incident took place. They were supporting the insurrection. www.nytimes.com/2024/05/28/u...
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
The second letter that @questauthority.bsky.social sent to LAPD reps on my behalf. Even more savage than “LOL, no.” I’ve highlighted my fave parts. What are yours?
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
That is why we need to appeal to heaven: because the courts and the law are not available to us. If Alito believes that we are in such a state now, he should, of course, resign immediately rather than participate in a legal system that (he thinks) has been turned into an instrument of tyranny.
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
Every low level lanyard job person in DC: please don’t wear a campaign button in my house, someone could see it and I might get in trouble SCOTUS: first you take a loan from someone with business before the court and then you just don’t pay it back. Did you see my insurrection flag.
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
Avatar
Omg
Antisemitism is very hard to solve conclusively Swin it’s not a family dog or a person having a mental health crisis
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
i think the best way to understand the supreme court's conduct in trump v. united states is as an explicit effort to intervene in the 2024 election on behalf of the former president. it is a gross abuse of power on par with dred scott and deserves to be met with sanction from the elected branches.
My thoughts on the oral argument and what the Court is likely to do:
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
Likud is mad. But Likud would be perfectly fine with Trump (or anyone else) turning America into a right-wing totalitarian kakistocracy as long as it was a right-wing totalitarian kakistocracy that backed Israel.
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
'The law, in its majestic equality, forbids Republican and Democratic Presidents alike from being investigated by anyone but a Republican.'
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
New: Clarence Thomas’ Private Complaints About Money Sparked Fears He Would Resign Interviews and newly unearthed documents reveal that Thomas, facing financial strain, privately pushed for a higher salary and to allow Supreme Court justices to take speaking fees.
Clarence Thomas’ Private Complaints About Money Sparked Fears He Would Resignwww.propublica.org Interviews and newly unearthed documents reveal that Thomas, facing financial strain, privately pushed for a higher salary and to allow Supreme Court justices to take speaking fees.
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
This is why I found this article, comparing the IDF's actions to the US/UK rules of engagement vs. al Qaeda and ISIS, so interesting. It quotes US officials saying that we took the upper limit on the number of civilians we could risk to get bin Laden to be 30. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/asse...
Assessing Israel’s Approach to Proportionality in the Conduct of Hostilities in Gazawww.lawfaremedia.org The Jabalia strike indicates that the IDF’s tolerance for civilian casualties is multiples greater than that of the U.S. in the ISIS war.
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
i love how this movie pulls no punches about how useless cops are
eating sweet potato pie with marshmallow ice cream and watching the new 4K release of the jewel of Dad Cinema
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar
New SCOTUS "code of conduct" expressly allows Justices to fundraise for and sit on the board of the Federalist Society.
READ THE TEXT: Here's the US Supreme Court's new "code of conduct" www.supremecourt.gov/about/Code-o...
Avatar
Thread
Probably gonna regret wading into this again, but just because lots of folks don't know the history of it The Second Amendment is not about personal liberty. It's also not about the right to overthrow the government or defend the nation from invasion. It was about suppressing slave rebellions
Avatar
Avatar
Clarence Thomas is corrupt AF.
Avatar
Thanks to @warrenterra.bsky.social for the invite. This place has a long way to go, but let’s hope it makes it.
Avatar
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar UghObWi
Avatar