Derrell Durrett

Profile banner

Derrell Durrett

@derrelldurrett.bsky.social

Ex physics. Software. Life-long observer of the public morality. Devoté of Poe's Law.

Potentially voluble.
Avatar
another fun one is how virtually no one mentioned Trump's "black jobs" comment that he said on live television lol
Wait, why am I just now learning about this?
Avatar
This is my tiktok feed right now
Avatar
Today I learned that Fawn Hall, the Ollie North assistant who helped him shred documents related to Iran-Contra, attended Jack Lemmon's 1988 AFI Lifetime Achievement Award ceremony with her date, Rob Lowe. What a world.
Avatar
Avatar
"I don't know anything about Project 2025" says man recording Project 2025 promotional video in front of Project 2025 publication. More substantively, Project 2025 has embraced Trump and Miller's immigration approach of using power to close both legal and illegal immigration.
Avatar
He doesn’t even bother to disavow Project 2025’s aims, but the fact that they’re shying away from direct association with it demonstrates that it’s a vulnerability. If the press is looking for something new and substantive to report on, they could start with the dystopia that these folks want for us
Stephen Miller now following Trump's lead and saying he has nothing to do with Project 2025. 1. His organization is on the Project 2025 advisory board. 2. He recorded a video as part of Project 2025 training tools 3. You can see Mandate for Leadership, the Project 2025 publication in the background
Avatar
Avatar
The French are world leaders at "The govt sucks, I'm voting for my ideal, no way I'll compromise, you compromise" (round 1) followed by "The only way to stop the far right? Ugh, fine." (round 2). Often a responsibility placed more on the left, but this time the center too, perhaps more. Let's see...
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Seems possible that Trump’s actions in the classified docs case aren’t “official” under the SCOTUS decision. But if he wins he can end the case, pardon himself, and pardon anyone who who would implicate him. And those *would* be “official acts,” immune from scrutiny. www.npr.org/2024/07/06/n...
Judge pauses deadlines in Trump classified documents case over immunity questionswww.npr.org Trump has argued that him taking classified documents to his Mar-a-Lago home constituted an official act — and that the Supreme Court's ruling means the charges against him should be dropped.
Avatar
Stephen Miller now following Trump's lead and saying he has nothing to do with Project 2025. 1. His organization is on the Project 2025 advisory board. 2. He recorded a video as part of Project 2025 training tools 3. You can see Mandate for Leadership, the Project 2025 publication in the background
Avatar
I don’t even know where to begin with this.
Avatar
there comes a time in every male journalist’s life where he must decide: am i going to sell my soul to fascists?
Avatar
I should think that, were I French, I'd want to carefully consider this sentiment when choosing my next assembly.
Avatar
I’m skeptical that X did in fact cause Z, when Z is Russia launching a war of choice and X does not include the Russian govt making a choice. But even if one assumes Russian actions aren’t due to Russian agency here, there’s no good reason to think reversing X would therefore reverse Z. It’s done.
Avatar
I don’t think that’s too reductive. A domestic abuser is a useful frame for understanding Putin (or, say, Trump and US media). Not 100% analogous of course, but definitely overlapping.
Avatar
I don't mean to be too reductive about things but I feel like every woman who has been in an abusive relationship knows exactly how this goes. There is only one trajectory. "If I just stop doing the thing that makes him angry, he won't shove me into a wall again."
Avatar
The "Ukraine never in NATO" crowd seems to think they're avoiding confrontation with Russia, but they're actually encouraging Russia in a confrontation that's well underway. Events are past the point where "don't make Russia nervous, don't push back, or they might get aggressive" becomes denial.
Avatar
These mistakes originalist justices are making aren’t about disputed interpretations of history, with evidence on both sides. They’re pulling quotes out of context to attribute ideas to founding figures that those figures adamantly opposed. (via @andycraig.bsky.social) reason.com/volokh/2024/...
The Supreme Court's Dubious Use of History in Department of State v. Munozreason.com Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion includes significant errors, and violates some of her own precepts against excessive reliance on questionable history.
Avatar
I once wrote a fact check of a Morgan Spurlock book. He included what he said was a direct quote from the FDA that aspartame causes cancer. I checked the footnote. An FDA newsletter did publish that claim — but *only to specifically refute it*. That’s basically how Barrett quotes Madison here.
These mistakes originalist justices are making aren’t about disputed interpretations of history, with evidence on both sides. They’re pulling quotes out of context to attribute ideas to founding figures that those figures adamantly opposed. (via @andycraig.bsky.social) reason.com/volokh/2024/...
The Supreme Court's Dubious Use of History in Department of State v. Munozreason.com Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion includes significant errors, and violates some of her own precepts against excessive reliance on questionable history.
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
I mean, this was true before Russia invaded Crimea. It's only become more true since. The actual solution was a NATO/Ukraine mutual defense pact in the aftermath of Ukraine surrendering its nukes, but that expired sometime around 2008.
The "Ukraine never in NATO" crowd seems to think they're avoiding confrontation with Russia, but they're actually encouraging Russia in a confrontation that's well underway. Events are past the point where "don't make Russia nervous, don't push back, or they might get aggressive" becomes denial.
Avatar
OK, this is perfectly horrifying.
I allowed students to use ChatGPT in 2023 for an assignment of their choice.. The output (shared thru group discussions) infected the class. The final exam had the worst average ever, by 10 points. It’s not that students didn’t know the answers. It’s that they had “learned” things that were untrue.
Avatar
I allowed students to use ChatGPT in 2023 for an assignment of their choice.. The output (shared thru group discussions) infected the class. The final exam had the worst average ever, by 10 points. It’s not that students didn’t know the answers. It’s that they had “learned” things that were untrue.
Avatar
This semester I’m going to tell my students I don’t care if they use ChatGPT to write their papers, much as I don’t care if they use LSD and a ouija board write their papers. I’ll give fancy-sounding bullshit a failing grade no matter how it’s produced.
Well this is grim
Avatar
the thing you really can't over-emphasize about reactionary centrists is how *dumb* they are www.persuasion.community/p/a-guide-fo...
Avatar
"We can't be bothered to teach it to you but you should definitely bother to learn it" Boy I dunno if that approach is going to work with children or really immature young adults whose motivation for anything academic is either weak and conditional or nonexistent.
Avatar
When children tease, they are imitating the adult world. And they are using their only power -- ridicule -- to try and impose the racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, and other prejudices of the world, wherever they can. It's why "anti-bullying" campaigns do not work.