n0nnahs

Profile banner

n0nnahs

@n0nnahs.bsky.social

🏳️‍⚧️transmasc they/them
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
Brain worms can't melt steel beams
I'll give the dog-eating rapist with brain worms this: "I won't take sides on 9/11" is the funniest campaign position
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
the dog is john roberts
July 4th is very rough on my dog (he is a royalist and considers George Washington a traitor)
Avatar
happy Thursday folks - the US does not deserve a birthday party this year, we can try again next year if we’re able to save the democracy. sorry, not sorry
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
"They're just fearmongering about Project 2025," brought to you by the people behind "They're just fearmongering about a coup" and "they're just fearmongering about abortion bans"
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
If you're so concerned about the stakes of this election you could just... spend the next four months writing about the stakes of this election. A constant drip of articles calling the Democratic nominee unfit is also not a great strategy for winning!
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
No, because SCOUTS will say it's not an official act. If Trump does it, this SCOTUS will say it was official. See how that works? People with SCOTUS friends are immensely powerful now, more than last Monday.
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
The gratuities are going to be amazing
Roberts rules for Trump. Absolute immunity for “official acts.” Vacated and remanded. Party line case. Both Sotomayor and Jackson dissent. Fuck this. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
www.supremecourt.gov
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
The GOP SCOTUS ruling on Presidential immunity, summed up.
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
Oh my God they actually rolled that Trump is an immune God-king. WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
presidents have immunity for "official acts" lmfao We. Are. Fucked.
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
The de-facto effect of this is the six-year statute of limitations for challenging agency action is now abolished, and any agency action no matter how old and settled is now effectively open to challenge...days after Chevron was overruled
First is Corner Post. Barrett has the court's 6-3 ideological decision holding that APA claims accrue from plaintiff's injury, not the date of the final rule — opening up all rules to possible new challenges. Jackson writes the dissent for the liberals. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
www.supremecourt.gov
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
Mike’s hard generational trauma.
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
Supreme Court no good
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
The Democratic Party’s reaction to their candidate having a bad debate substantially outpaces the Republican Party’s reaction to their candidate being convicted of multiple felonies, held liable for rape, and owing judgments in the hundreds of millions for defamation and fraud.
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
When the choice is between an elderly person with a raspy voice surrounded by dedicated professionals who believe in science & representative democracy and a sociopathic, fascist sex pest who lies with conviction and confidence & will surround himself with rabid jackals...well, the choice is clear.
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
tweeted this four years ago and it pretty much sums up my feelings on this shit
Avatar
"we've put more police on the streets" idk if that's something we should be proud of, Biden...
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
Tapper: "We will be right back with more from CNN Presidential Debate." But why?
Avatar
i feel like my alley cats have much better morals than trump, thank you very much
Avatar
oh jan 6 was pelosi's fault, good to know
Avatar
Avatar
oh god dear lord what was that
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
Supreme Court allows women to get health care when they're dying, as a little treat
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
I, for one, would prefer not to have new pharmaceutical approvals or nuclear power plant regulations decided by Marjorie Taylor Greene and Tommy Tuberville. But maybe that's just me?
Reposted byAvatar n0nnahs
Avatar
If you’re not a law nerd, and you’re wondering why people who are not themselves theocratic fascists would support theocratic fascists, it’s to achieve this: to limit the power of the regulatory state.
NEW: SCOTUS could soon overturn the "Chevron doctrine," upending numerous federal regulations designed to protect the public. At least 20 right-wing groups linked to court-whisperers like Charles Koch and Leonard Leo have backed the assault on Chevron. therevolvingdoorproject.org/amicus-spotl...
Amicus Spotlight: Loper Bright & Relentless | Revolving Door Projecttherevolvingdoorproject.org 20 right-wing groups linked to court-whisperers want SCOTUS to make its most dangerous regulatory power grab yet.
Avatar
He also said he agreed with the idea that people in America who believe in God must fight “to return our country to a place of godliness.” disturbing to say the least