Martin Pánek

Profile banner

Martin Pánek

@mmister.com

Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
Stephen Miller now following Trump's lead and saying he has nothing to do with Project 2025. 1. His organization is on the Project 2025 advisory board. 2. He recorded a video as part of Project 2025 training tools 3. You can see Mandate for Leadership, the Project 2025 publication in the background
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
very hard to figure out what this use of DEI could mean other than the n word
Subtle. Very subtle.
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
I wish someone kept a list of all the imbeciles who said Elon Musk is a free speech hero so I could waggle a middle finger in their insipid faces until it fell off
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
You might very well think now there's only one man who can lead the Tories back to power and take down the Woke King, but he couldn't possibly comment.
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
V posledních letech jedno z nejnákladnějších vozidel...
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
It is always a good time to read or reread Frederick Douglass's "What, To the Slave, Is the Fourth of July?" It is pure fire. One of the greatest speeches in American oratory. More and more people are appreciating Douglass!
Over at the Bad Place, I made a tradition of posting Douglass' "What, To The Slave, Is The Fourth of July," and I intend to carry on that tradition here. Since most versions you read in classes or in textbooks have parts omitted, the link below has the full text of the speech.
(1852) Frederick Douglass, "What, To The Slave, Is The Fourth Of July" •www.blackpast.org On July 5, 1852, Frederick Douglass was invited to address the citizens of his hometown, Rochester, New York. Whatever the expectations of his audience on that 76th anniversary of the signing of the D...
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
Podmanivá večerní atmosféra u jezera Seeley v Montaně🌿
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
When you're worried there might be a pride flag at semiquincentennial parade
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
Honestly still in shock that the most crooked American President in history said "I need immunity" and the GOP Supreme Court said "well, it's nowhere in the constitution, but sure, why not? Whats the worst that could happen?"
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
idk it just seems to me that laws, like tech, should be created with the question "what would the worst person i know be able to do with this power" in mind and it's truly incredible how much this opinion fails at that basic task
John Roberts must be the most neurotypical person in existence because the immunity ruling reads like someone who has never had a single “but what if…???” anxiety spiral in his life
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
sure it’s heritage being heritage, but their continued escalation of the violent rhetoric and threats is not to be taken lightly. especially not after j6
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
jurassic bark
Road trip log continues; this seems like a great day to post pics of happy dogs. After the show, we found a spot where fishboys could have a good tear and get entirely wet and filthy. Then we all went for a swim in the John Day river, which was great.
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
He's right. They're stealing the country from us and ending democracy. "Bloodless if the left allows it to be" is a threat to kill anyone who fights back
Heritage Foundation president celebrates Supreme Court presidential immunity ruling: "We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be" www.mediamatters.org/project-2025...
Heritage Foundation president celebrates Supreme Court immunity decision: "We are in the process of the second American Revolution"www.mediamatters.org
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
I don’t think it’s an exaggeration at all to say the decision threatens the Republic. I might not have said so in 2015, before I saw how triumphantly lawless and autocratic the President could be, and how so many people would applaud it or at least shrug.
My friend and colleague Ken White has written a great thread describing some (but far from all) of the enormous problems with today's decision by Chief Justice Roberts granting Donald Trump criminal immunity on grounds never before accepted by any court. Today's decision threatens the Republic.
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
Can't be impeached because presidential impeachment has been a dead letter since parties came into existence. Can't be disqualified from office. And can't be prosecuted for crimes committed under color of office.
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
March 23 1933, the Enabling Act becomes law in Germany, giving the chief executive power enforce his own laws without checks and balances. The passing of the Act marked the formal transition from democratic republic to totalitarian dictatorship. 6 months later, it was a 1 party state.
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
The 14th Amendment says if you were involved in an insurrection you can't be president. SCOTUS said they won't allow anyone to enforce that because of reasons they made up. The Constitution doesn't say the president is immune from criminal law. SCOTUS decided he is because of reasons they made up.
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
like I'm sorry these people are the ones who spend all their time talking about how the inviolable intent of the founders is the only thing that matters there aren't a lot of things that the founders agreed on but "fuck kings" was about as close a consensus position as you could find!
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
Also just tossing it out there, but SCOTUS saying "we need to do this to protect executive authority" when it's literally the executive branch arguing they shouldn't, sort of gives the lie to the idea this was about protecting constitutional departmental interests as opposed to protecting Mr Trump
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
all of this for donald fucking trump of all people
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
The lesson Roberts and Thomas draw from the unprecedented nature of Trump's indictments is not that he's a unique threat (as per all available evidence). The real threat to "liberty" is the possibility that, someday, the most powerful person on earth could, in theory, be unjustly accused of a crime.
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
Trump "re-truthed" this meme yesterday. But look, whatever you do, don't call it fascism.
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
Legal pundits over time Dec 1, 2023: SCOTUS will reject Trump's appeal on an expedited basis Dec 22, 2023: They are letting the DC Circuit handle it to not even dignify it. Feb 28, 2024: The are taking the case on appeal but will completely reject the claim. June: SCOTUS says Trump is your God/King
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
Homeless people can be arrested for sleeping, Presidents cannot be arrested for rampant graft and corruption done while in office. There is no clearer a summary of "conservative 'law and order'" than this.
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
Absolutely wild that the court accuses the dissent of "fearmongering" with "extreme hypotheticals" when the actual basis for the indictment is a coup attempt that led to an attack on the capitol
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar
NYT: Joe should quit, he stutters Philly Inquirer: Trump is a fucking criminal what the fuck are we doing here
God Bless Paul Davies and the @PhillyInquirer: "The only person who should withdraw from the race is Trump...There was only one person at the debate who does not deserve to be running for president. The sooner Trump exits the stage, the better off the country will be."
To serve his country, Donald Trump should leave the race | Editorial Boardwww.inquirer.com Biden had a horrible night Thursday. But the debate about the debate is misplaced. The only person who should withdraw from the race is Trump.
Reposted byAvatar Martin Pánek
Avatar