theresaboulineau.bsky.social

@theresaboulineau.bsky.social

Posts

Reposted by

John Roberts legacy will be convincing the majority of Americans that the Supreme Court is a corrupt and outdated institution that needs to be radically reformed.

Citizens United, Shelby County, Trump v. Hawaii, and now United States v. Trump. John Roberts' legacy for democracy.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

The States Project is one of the best bang-for-your-buck options for your campaign donations. Even beyond it, though, state legislatures deserve your attention. Next time you're tempted to send money to whoever's going to lose to MTG, send it instead to a contested state leg seat.

Looking for one person to join me today in donating to flipping both statehouses in Arizona to create a new trifecta for democracy. This is the smartest political donation we can make this year.

Flipping Arizona | The States Projectwww.grapevine.org Learn more about Flipping Arizona such as its mission, community impact, and how you can join or make a one-time online donation.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

Just my own assumption here, but media tends to expect the left to protest, & therefore considers their demonstrations less newsworthy than right-wing protests. Much like the media expects Dems to govern, get things done & clean up R messes, & thus deems those acts less newsworthy than if Rs do them

I swear I don't get any kick backs for reposting this but the underlying issue is the media has a bias against protest especially liberal protest. It's called the protest paradigm and its been documented for more than 40 years at this point. Link in next skeet.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

My article for @newrepublic “The Supreme Court has effectively ruled that 250 years of U.S. history under a republic is enough.” newrepublic.com/article/1833...

The Supreme Court Turns the President Into a Kingnewrepublic.com The conservative justices have ignored history altogether and created a shocking new precedent: The president is above the law.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

I really cannot emphasize how catastrophically bad the Court's ruling was. I do my best not to exaggerate about these kinds of things but I am still kind of in shock

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

If you’re wondering what the system burning down looks like, we’re not there yet but the match been lit. Still time blow it out but it’s being held close to the gunpowder.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

The 14th Amendment says if you were involved in an insurrection you can't be president. SCOTUS said they won't allow anyone to enforce that because of reasons they made up. The Constitution doesn't say the president is immune from criminal law. SCOTUS decided he is because of reasons they made up.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

Fun fact about the US political system: the executive branch can just ignore the judicial branch and nothing will happen unless the legislative branch is a functioning body.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

anyway, is everyone good and mad now? fucking stay that way for the next five months, there will be more aggressions and indignities and insults to come. staying mad as hell about it is how we won in 2020 and it's how we'll win in 2024.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

Where we are as a country

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

March 23 1933, the Enabling Act becomes law in Germany, giving the chief executive power enforce his own laws without checks and balances. The passing of the Act marked the formal transition from democratic republic to totalitarian dictatorship. 6 months later, it was a 1 party state.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

The Court ruling today is terrible but expected. I will just gently remind everyone that the election hasn’t happened yet. We shouldn’t assume the worst outcome as a foregone conclusion. That only encourages more apathy than many are already feeling.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

governments are large and complicated you aren't voting for Biden or Trump you are voting for a boring center-left administration or Project 2025

look i'll be clear, I will be voting, and encouraging everyone I know to do the same, against donald trump and the end of democracy in this country in november. I do not care if that means i'm voting for a man who is literally dead.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

sorry but “keep electing democrat presidents and senate majorities indefinitely until enough of scotus dies” never was and certainly is not now good enough. it’s just now. party leadership needs to wake the fuck up

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

a vote for the Democratic candidate is, among many other things that are also good, a vote for being allowed to continue to vote in the future

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

SCOTUS is clearly banking on a Trump win and giving him the tools to remain in power once he does. This is a do or die moment. We either stop squabbling amongst ourselves and beat MAGA or it's over. Those are the stakes.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

The SCOTUS might legit be the most corrupt court on earth currently which is no less wild because it's true

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

Gorsuch is sitting in Merrick Garland’s seat. Barrett’s confirmation was rushed through two weeks before an election. Kavanaugh is a credibly accused rapist with magically disappearing debts. Alito signals he’s not impartial. Thomas takes bribes. This Supreme Court is illegitimate.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

i have so much boundless contempt for these pathetic white men, who were blessed enough to be born in one of the few attempts at multiracial democracy in the world, and who panic at being no more valued than anyone else to the extent that they'd blow it all up and go back to divine right of kings

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

In normal times, the Supreme Court would've smacked down claims of presidential immunity almost immediately, but we're not in normal times, and there's a reason why the conservative majority of Federalist Society bagmen waited until the last possible moment to provide this insane ruling.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

"Expand the court" has gone from radical solution to the most exceptionally moderate option on the table.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

The Supreme Court sure is a collection of lifetime appointees. That's what it is, that's what you can say about them. They are appointed for life and they make the lives of everyone else worse all the time, except for the lives of the worst and most powerful people in the country. That's them.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

Justice Sotomayor: "Today’s decision ... makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our Constitution and system of Government, that no man is above the law... "With fear for our democracy, I dissent."

BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds, 6-3, that a former president is absolutely immune from prosecution for actions within their "conclusive and preclusive" authority and presumptively immune from prosecution for all official acts. More to come at Law Dork: www.lawdork.com

Law Dork | Chris Geidner | Substackwww.lawdork.com The Supreme Court, law, politics, and more. Click to read Law Dork, by Chris Geidner, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of subscribers.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

The only obstacle between the U.S. and autocracy this fall is you, me, and everyone physically, mentally and legally able to cast a ballot.

We have to do it at the ballot box, we have to do it through strikes, we have to do it through being elected, we have to do it through direct actions. Let 100 flowers blossom. None of it can work on its own.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

Lose yourself for a while, in the magic of an Irish rainforest. 🌍

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

Liz Warren on twitter has the correct message for us going forward:

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

Luckovich

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

The conservative justices do not think the EPA should exist

Supreme Court blocks EPA’s ‘downwind’ air-quality initiativewww.washingtonpost.com States, trade associations and companies sought to pause the EPA’s “good neighbor” plan to fight downwind pollution, which is being challenged in a lower court.

Reposted by

theresaboulineau.bsky.social

Today's decisions in Ohio v. EPA and SEC v. Jarkesy will likely not get the press that cases involving the major questions doctrine* might, but make no mistake, these are but smaller steps toward the significant limitation or elimination of regulatory agency power.